Lets get serious

[Nabil Naser]

Snow flakes
Carbon
Honeycomb

Star light
Star of David

Subatomic particles

Does anyone have doubt that the Hexagon is real?

[Jack Donaldson]

Does Phi share any correlation to the Hexagon? I'm trying to remember, and now I think it is coming to me. Is the value of Phi .6180? the value of Pi has been known to me far longer than the former, but I can never remember it. I had to look it up just now to find it is 3.1415 and I have seen discussion upon phi and pi indicating a correlation of the former to the out-breath, while the latter relates to the in-breath.

I like all the interesting ways numbers can be linked to manifestation, but I don't require math in my life or job. I'm only good at a thing which applies to employment or my interests. This last remark doesn't mean I lack appreciation of what a serious mathematician can express using numbers.

I should think more along the lines of the in-breath and out-breath, along with pi and phi.

[Nabil Naser]

"I should think more along the lines of the in-breath and out-breath, along with pi and phi."

My view Jack, is to avoid the SHOULD whenever you can

You don't have to be a mathematician to relate to basic arguments of creation. If one can add and use a pencil, one can easily see the connections.

Some of the most fundamental aspects of reality can be seen with a piece of paper and a pencil. Draw a circle, consider its attributes. Think of it as a part "equator, diameter" of a sphere. Next, draw equal circles next to it, where the circles touch each other. Now consider what happens if the circles "spheres" are spinning in place. Think about them spinning in the same direction, then in opposite direction. What happens at the point where they meet?
You can add more circles "Spheres" with different spin direction, and see what is generated.

What is generated is the basic structure of the vaccum "space".
Try it, it is fun. Particularly if you compare it to atomic structure and interaction.

[Jack Donaldson]

The outer spheres rotate opposite the spin of the center sphere. The outer spheres generate more friction between each, less friction exists between central sphere and outer spheres. However, friction produced between each of the outer spheres emanates outward away from central sphere, and also inward to central sphere. If spin vector oscillates, a pulse expresses. The in-breath/out-breath, amrita-yana.

Shall and should both meant owed, or obligated, an incurred debt or burden to shoulder. Using the word 'should' often, lessons the value of the mans word. I think you might have been a bit persnickety however. Most people are not aware of the old meanings. We now say things like ah-ight instead of all-right, and much more better, which is a direct violation of the Latin ruling upon split infinitives.

[Nabil Naser]

First, let me tell you that it is wonderful to read your words, and your understandings.

That is not what I meant when I said that the world should is no good. Should represents an order from somewhere that you feel that you have to obey.

Remember, it is you who makes the decisions. If it is something that you wish to do, then say it as it is. Say, I want to do this, not because I have to or because I should.

Should life feel like a burden? I think not

[christinaleestemaker]

as you can see sun shining on a glass, you can see involuton and evolution, rayparts in a form of the 8. Same I see with candle light.Rays from the flame and into it.
As it is mirroring.

[Jeff Zolkes]

Well I shudn't have ought ta had read dis here diskusshun.

[christinaleestemaker]

The dodecaeder is real.

[Nabil Naser]

Jeff

the Discussion may have bothered you because of its depth and complexity, and the state you were in when you read it.
I am not trying to preach, although I teach.
"Should" is an inner order. One must think very carefully before accepting that they "should" do something.

[Jeff Zolkes]

it was just a joke, Nabil... Don't you realize I don't really talk or write like that?

[Jeff Zolkes]

Trust me, it is hardly "too complex" for me, either. ahem.

[christinaleestemaker]

A colour hexagon designed to allow an optical illusion to show the complementary colours. Focussing on the centre of the hexagon for 5 seconds, and then staring at the star on the right will cause the illusion of a hexagon appearing - in colours complementary to the left-hand hexagon

[christinaleestemaker]

Only I see it as yellow up and red down right side ; cyan up and blue down on left side and green upside and magenta downside or converted across.